This week I've watched the series finales of two TV series I've been watching for the last 4 or 5 years - Battlestar Galactica and Regenesis (somewhat belatedly in both cases since their last episodes were broadcast quite a while ago - and it has been hard to avoid all the spoilers flying around for BSG).
Some spoilers:
( BSG finale )
Unsurprisingly, I didn't have any problem avoiding spoilers for Regenesis, since not many people seem to watch it, which I think is unfortunate since IMO it's been one of the best TV shows of the past decade. The show is set in a Toronto biology lab of a fictitious organisation responsible for responding to biological threats in North America, everything from bioterrorism and virus outbreaks through to illegal attempts at genetic engineering. It's a Science Fiction show, but not in the all-too-common sense of having some dubious quality science to explain why the show has robots and spaceships, but it is actually a show about science where all the main characters are scientists. It is a rare example of a show that doesn't shy away from using lots of scientific terminology, and as far as I can tell most of it is based in real science - although admittedly, biology was the science I didn't do at school so I'm not best placed to judge, and some of the plots do go a bit beyond real science into genuine Science Fiction territory. It also does a good job of showing the scientific process and the limitations of it - see the multiple episodes where the characters exasperatedly try to explain to the media or politicians why just because a scientific study didn't find a drug was harmful, doesn't necessarily mean it was safe, or that just because they haven't yet explained a disease outbreak doesn't mean it was necessarily a terrorist attack. As refreshing as it is to have a show that is actually reasonably scientifically literate, that wouldn't have made it a great show on its own, but the quality of the writing, dialogue, characterisation and storytelling is very high, the show is fast-moving and frequently compelling both in its plots and the interactions of the characters. The production values, directing and acting are all very high quality as well - the lead actor, Peter Outerbridge, is particularly good in his portrayal of David Sandstrom, a memorable and entertaining character is simulataneously a scientific genius and also an irascible and deeply flawed alcoholic.
That said, after four seasons of frequently excellent storytelling, I found the final episode a huge disappointment and I'd say far inferior to the BSG finale, despite its weaknesses.
( vague spoilers for Regenesis finale )
Regardless of which of the two possible interperations of the last episode you use, it's almost certainly the worst (by a considerable distance) of any of the 52 episodes of the show. Despite that, I'd still recommend the show, it was more episodic than, say, BSG, and therefore the quality of the earlier episodes is not negatively impacted by the poor ending in the way a more story-arc based show would be.
Some spoilers:
( BSG finale )
Unsurprisingly, I didn't have any problem avoiding spoilers for Regenesis, since not many people seem to watch it, which I think is unfortunate since IMO it's been one of the best TV shows of the past decade. The show is set in a Toronto biology lab of a fictitious organisation responsible for responding to biological threats in North America, everything from bioterrorism and virus outbreaks through to illegal attempts at genetic engineering. It's a Science Fiction show, but not in the all-too-common sense of having some dubious quality science to explain why the show has robots and spaceships, but it is actually a show about science where all the main characters are scientists. It is a rare example of a show that doesn't shy away from using lots of scientific terminology, and as far as I can tell most of it is based in real science - although admittedly, biology was the science I didn't do at school so I'm not best placed to judge, and some of the plots do go a bit beyond real science into genuine Science Fiction territory. It also does a good job of showing the scientific process and the limitations of it - see the multiple episodes where the characters exasperatedly try to explain to the media or politicians why just because a scientific study didn't find a drug was harmful, doesn't necessarily mean it was safe, or that just because they haven't yet explained a disease outbreak doesn't mean it was necessarily a terrorist attack. As refreshing as it is to have a show that is actually reasonably scientifically literate, that wouldn't have made it a great show on its own, but the quality of the writing, dialogue, characterisation and storytelling is very high, the show is fast-moving and frequently compelling both in its plots and the interactions of the characters. The production values, directing and acting are all very high quality as well - the lead actor, Peter Outerbridge, is particularly good in his portrayal of David Sandstrom, a memorable and entertaining character is simulataneously a scientific genius and also an irascible and deeply flawed alcoholic.
That said, after four seasons of frequently excellent storytelling, I found the final episode a huge disappointment and I'd say far inferior to the BSG finale, despite its weaknesses.
( vague spoilers for Regenesis finale )
Regardless of which of the two possible interperations of the last episode you use, it's almost certainly the worst (by a considerable distance) of any of the 52 episodes of the show. Despite that, I'd still recommend the show, it was more episodic than, say, BSG, and therefore the quality of the earlier episodes is not negatively impacted by the poor ending in the way a more story-arc based show would be.